The purpose of our study was to compare T2-weighted breath-hold fast spin-echo sequence (BHFSE) and high-resolution dynamic MR imaging (HR-DMRI) in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Short and long T2-weighted BHFSE sequences and biphasic HR-DMRI including arterial-dominant and delayed phase images with a phased-array body coil were performed in 30 consecutive patients with 37 HCCs. The lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was quantitatively measured. The lesion conspicuity and delineation was qualitatively rated according to a four-point scale. The lesion-to-liver CNR was highest with the arterial-dominant phase HR-DMRI and was significantly higher than those obtained with both short and long T2-weighted BHFSE and those obtained with unenhanced and delayed HR-DMRI. The CNR obtained with short T2-weighted BHFSE was significantly higher than those obtained with long T2-weighted BHFSE and with unenhanced and delayed HR-DMRI. The sensitivity for the sequences was 78.4% (29/37) for short T2-weighted BHFSE, 67.6% (25/37) for long T2-weighted BHFSE, 37.8% (14/37) for unenhanced HR-DMRI, 97.3% (36/37) for arterial-dominant phase HR-DMRI, and 43.2% (16/37) for delayed HR-DMRI. The sensitivity of serial dynamic MR imaging combined with unenhanced, arterial-dominant phase imaging and delayed phase imaging was 100% (37/37). The score in the qualitative analysis of the lesion conspicuity and delineation was highest for the arterial-dominant phase HR-DMRI and was significantly higher than that for the short T2-weighted BHFSE. The score for the short T2-weighted BHFSE was significantly higher than that for the long T2-weighted BHFSE and that for the unenhanced HR-DMRI. Arterial-dominant phase HR-DMRI is superior to the T2-weighted BHFSE technique, and also HR-DMRI combined with unenhanced, arterial-dominant and delayed phases is the most sensitive technique in the detection of HCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujita et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: