Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 1, 1997Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Supracondylar Femur Fracture Fixation: Locked Intramedullary Nail Versus 95-Degree Angled Plate

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SDStephen M. DavidMHMatthew E. HarrowRPRichard D. Peindl

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

David et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a96cbd533d7b00ae7bb9dc6https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199707000-00008
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment of Supracondylar-Intracondylar Fractures of the Femur Using the Dynamic Condylar Screw1989 · 138 citations
  2. 2Double-plating of comminuted, unstable fractures of the distal part of the femur.1991 · 255 citations
  3. 3Interlocking intramedullary nailing for supracondylar and intercondylar fractures of the distal part of the femur.1991 · 148 citations
  4. 4Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw.1982 · 149 citations
  5. 5Zickel Supracondylar Nails for Fractures of the Distal End of the Femur1986 · 41 citations