Key result
An electronic referral system for patients with acute myocardial infarction increased total cardiac rehabilitation referrals by a factor of 1.8 and inpatient referrals 17-fold (P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does an electronic referral system increase cardiac rehabilitation referrals in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=1,895)
No
Does an electronic referral system increase cardiac rehabilitation referrals in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: 1.8-fold increase in total referrals; 17-fold increase in inpatient referrals
p-value: p=<0.0001
Switching from paper-based to electronic referrals significantly increased cardiac rehabilitation referral volume for patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Electronic referral was associated with higher post-MI cardiac rehabilitation referrals; hypothesis-generating for randomized trials on enrollment and outcomes.
AIM: Although cardiac rehabilitation attendance is associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), it remains underutilized nationally. We sought to determine whether replacing traditional, paper-based referrals for cardiac rehabilitation for patients with AMI with an electronic referral system would increase utilization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We implemented the change from traditional, paper-based referrals to electronic referrals at the Massachusetts General Hospital on 10 December 2013. Using a segmented regression approach to control for other secular effects, we assessed an association between the intervention and inpatient referrals, total referrals, cardiac rehabilitation attendance at Massachusetts General Hospital, and the rate of inpatient referral to cardiac rehabilitation after AMI. We analyzed 1895 referral records over a 30-month period. After the intervention, the total referrals to our cardiac rehabilitation program increased by a factor of 1.8, largely attributable to a 17-fold increase in inpatient referrals (P<0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: Even relative to pre-existing secular trends, switching to an electronic referral system was associated with an increase in referral volume for cardiac rehabilitation for patients with AMI. Electronic care innovations may improve the ability of provider organizations to provide guideline-oriented care for patients with coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pirruccello et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1,895). Electronic referral system vs. Traditional, paper-based referrals was evaluated on Inpatient referrals, total referrals, cardiac rehabilitation attendance, and rate of inpatient referral (1.8-fold increase in total referrals; 17-fold increase in inpatient referrals, p=<0.0001). An electronic referral system for patients with acute myocardial infarction increased total cardiac rehabilitation referrals by a factor of 1.8 and inpatient referrals 17-fold (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: