Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: A new experimental surgical technique to correct spherical hyperopia by steepening of the central corneal curvature was performed on human cadaver eyes. METHODS: Ten eyes were used in the study. All were pretreated with glycerin to ensure a uniform corneal thickness between .55 and .65 mm on ultrasonic pachometry. A constant intraocular pressure of approximately 30 to 40 mm Hg was maintained in each eye by the injection of saline into the vitreous cavity. This was verified by pneumotonometry. A vertical blade diamond knife was set at 100% of the thinnest of four paracentral readings. Each eye underwent preoperative computed topography. One set of five eyes had 12 incisions made following a 5.75-millimeter diameter Mendez hexagonal marker that included unconnected T incisions at each junction (ie, "Hex T" pattern). The other set of five eyes had four arcuate incisions made following a 6-millimeter diameter zone marker; each incision was 60 degrees in arc. Immediately after surgery, computed topography was repeated. RESULTS: The hexagonal keratotomy set of eyes had an average steepening of the cornea of 0.80 D with a range of -1.05 to + 4.38 D. The arcuate keratotomy set had an average steepening of +2.12 D with a range of +1.27 to +3.27 D. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests arcuate keratotomy may be a more effective procedure in the correction of spherical hyperopia when compared with hexagonal keratotomy. The amount of corneal steepening achieved in a cadaver eye model may not be the same as when performed in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vrabec et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: