STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: To determine if a prospective randomized study of patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease treated with disc arthroplasty could be safely completed. METHODS: Sixty patients with one-level discogenic pain confirmed by plain radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and provocative discography for degenerative disc disease were randomized comparing 1/3 BAK anterior interbody fusion and 2/3 anterior SB Charitè artificial disc replacement. RESULTS: The mean age was 40.3 years (range 21-56 years). Nineteen cases were at L4-L5 and 41 cases were at L5-S1. Nineteen cases had BAK anterior interbody fusion and 41 cases were randomized as SB Charitè disc replacement. The length of surgery was mean 88.4 minutes (range 54-137 minutes) for both groups. The estimated blood loss was mean 289.5 cc (range 50-1800 cc). The length of hospital stay was a mean of 3.03 days (range 2 to 6 days). Oswestry Disability Index for the BAK control group was 45.9 +/- 10.4 before surgery and 23.5 +/- 17.2 at follow-up (P < 0.001). The corresponding ODI scores for the SB Charitè disc were 50.0 +/- 14.3 before surgery and 25.0 +/- 20.1 at a mean of 2 years' follow-up (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that shows improvement of functional outcome measures in a prospective randomized design treating primarily mechanical back pain and achieving comparable successful results to lumbar spinal stenosis decompression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McAfee et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: