Immunologic‐mediated Protection of Trypanosoma congolense‐Infected Mice by Polyribonucleotides

SYNOPSIS. When the synthetic polyribonucleotides polyinosinic acid‐polycytidylic acid (poly I poly C) and polyadenylic acid‐polyuridylic acid (poly A poly U) were tested against mice infected with varying numbers of Trypanosoma congolense the results varied with the method of passage of trypanosomes in mice. Thus, when 100 flagellates were passaged every 7th day and experiments were initiated with these trypanosomes from mice on the 7th day of their infection, the protective effects of poly I poly C and poly A poly U apparently varied independently of each other as assayed by the mean parasitemias and cumulative mortalities of infected mice. Poly I poly C‐resistant and poly I poly C‐susceptible variants (“R” and “S”, respectively) were isolated and maintained in mice by passage of 106 trypanosomes every 4th day. Mice infected with these variants responded consistently to poly I poly C and poly A poly U injections in that mice infected with the “R” variant showed no response to either polyribonucleotide but those infected with the “S” variant consistently had a decrease in mean parasitemias and cumulative mortality when treated with poly I poly C, but not with poly A poly U. Using mice infected with the “S” variant, the protective effect of poly I poly C was dose‐dependent and best protection was afforded when 1st injections of poly I poly C were given around the time of infection of the mice. The protective effects of the synthetic polyribonucleotides used in these experiments are probably due to their immunologic enhancing capacities and not to interferon. To support this, injections of Newcastle disease virus, a strong inducer of interferon in mice, did not protect against T. congolense in mice. It was not possible to determine whether serum from poly I poly C‐treated mice had a greater neutralizing effect upon trypanosomes in vitro than serum from saline‐treated mice since any effect of antibody was masked by a naturally occurring inhibitor in normal mouse serum which was reduced during infection. The protective effects of poly I poly C in T. congolense‐infected mice were reversed by treatment with cyclophosphamide. This strong immunosuppressant, however, could not reverse the protective effects of poly I poly C against mice infected with Semliki Forest virus, strongly suggesting that the protective mechanisms stimulated by poly I poly C in these 2 infections were different. The response of mice infected with the “R” and “S” variants of T. congolense to synthetic polyribonucleotides is discussed in relation to antigenic variation of trypanosomes.