BACKGROUND: Evaluation of long-term outcomes of free-muscle transfer for smile restoration is overdue. Arguments for and against free-muscle transplantation in children are considered, and the debate on the influence of the growing skeleton on muscle function is revisited. This study evaluated the fate of free-muscle transfer over long follow-up periods in pediatric patients. METHODS: Thirty-two children with follow-up of 5 years or longer who received a free-muscle transfer for smile restoration were reviewed. To better analyze the effect of time, patients were classified into groups based on the length of follow-up: group A, 5 to 6 years; group B, 7 to 10 years; group C, 11 to 15 years; and group D, more than 15 years. Patients were videotaped at three stages: preoperatively, 2 years after free-muscle transfer, and at the last follow-up visit. Four independent observers graded patients' videotapes using a five-category scale ranging from poor to excellent. Panelists were asked to comment on any noticeable craniofacial disharmony with growth. RESULTS: All patients exhibited improved function and symmetry at 2 years after free-muscle transfer (averaged scores, p < 0.0001). A positive effect of time was seen in the long-term evaluation; observers' scores (p < 0.0001) and motor units on electromyography (p = 0.001) showed further improvement. No significance was found when comparing measured outcomes among the four follow-up groups, indicating that despite the growing skeleton, muscle function was maintained over time. CONCLUSIONS: These clinical data support the use of free-muscle transfer for smile restoration in children. The transplanted muscle appears to grow harmoniously with the craniofacial skeleton, and muscle function and aesthetic outcomes improved over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terzis et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: