Key result
Mitral valve repair with the Alfieri stitch showed similar up to 10-year survival (84% vs 81%, P=0.2) and moderate or more MR (24% vs 17%, P=0.2) compared to repair without the stitch.
Why the study?
Little is published on the late durability of mitral valve repair using the Alfieri stitch, and the potential risk of mitral stenosis remains controversial.
Does mitral valve repair with the Alfieri stitch provide durable clinical and echocardiographic outcomes compared to repair without the stitch in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation?
Cohort (n=1,175)
Does mitral valve repair with the Alfieri stitch provide durable clinical and echocardiographic outcomes compared to repair without the stitch in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 84% vs 81%
p-value: p=0.2
The Alfieri stitch is a durable technique for degenerative mitral valve repair, demonstrating late clinical and echocardiographic outcomes comparable to other repair techniques without significantly increasing the risk of mitral stenosis.
Supports Alfieri stitch in degenerative MR repair; extends observational durability data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Background: Mitral valve repair with the edge‐to‐edge technique (Alfieri stitch) has been described for over 20 years, yet little is published on late durability and potential risk of mitral stenosis remains controversial. The primary objective of this study is to describe characteristics and late durability of Alfieri stitch in mitral valve repair. Methods: From 2004 to 2019, we reviewed data from our prospectively maintained institutional database on 1175 consecutive patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) who underwent repair. Patients undergoing concomitant operations were included. Propensity score matching was performed on patients with and without Alfieri stitch to compare clinical (survival and reoperation) and echocardiographic (moderate or severe MR [“moderate or more MR”], severe MR, and mitral stenosis) outcomes up to 10 years. Results: Overall, 1175 patients underwent mitral valve repair; 55.1% ( n = 648) received the Alfieri stitch. The median follow‐up was 4.7 (2.0, 8.2) years. Matched patients with and without Alfieri stitch had similar cumulative incidence (CI) of moderate or more MR (24% ± 5% vs. 17% ± 4%, p = 0.2, respectively), severe MR (5% ± 2% vs. 4% ± 2%, p = 0.3), and mitral reoperation (9% ± 3% vs. 2% ± 1%, p = 0.06) with no difference in survival (84% ± 3% vs. 81% ± 3%, p = 0.2). The Alfieri stitch resulted in a slightly higher mean mitral valve gradient (3.9% ± 1.5 mmHg vs. 3.6% ± 1.6 mmHg, p = 0.0003). The CI of mitral stenosis at 10 years was negligible (one patient with Alfieri stitch and two patients without Alfieri stitch). Conclusions: In selected patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation, mitral valve repair with Alfieri stitch is durable with late outcomes comparable with other repair techniques. The Alfieri stitch may be a useful tool in selecting complex mitral pathology with minimal increased incidence of mitral stenosis. Further investigation is needed to delineate best indications for the use of Alfieri stitch.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zwischenberger et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Degenerative mitral regurgitation (n=1,175). Alfieri stitch vs. Mitral valve repair without Alfieri stitch was evaluated on Survival up to 10 years (p=0.2). Mitral valve repair with the Alfieri stitch showed similar up to 10-year survival (84% vs 81%, P=0.2) and moderate or more MR (24% vs 17%, P=0.2) compared to repair without the stitch.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: