The disposal of fission products and actinides generated by the nuclear-fuel cycle is one of the major challenges in Environ-mental Sciences of the 21st Century. Because some fission products (e.g., 99Tc, 129I, 79Se and 135Cs) and actinides (e.g., 239Pu and 237Np) are long-lived, they have a major impact on the risk assessment of geological repositories. Thus, demonstrable long-term chemical and mechanical durability are essential properties of waste forms for the immobilization and disposal of radionuclides. Mineralogical and geological studies provide excellent candidate phases for immobilization and a unique database that cannot be duplicated by a purely Materials Science approach. The “mineralogical approach ” is illustrated by a discussion of zircon as a phase for the immobilization of plutonium from dismantled nuclear weapons. Other minerals, e.g., monazite, apatite, pyrochlore, zirconolite and zeolites, also are important candidates for the immobilization of actinides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodney C. Ewing (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: