Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two linear (1Σ+ and Π)1 and three bent (1 1A′, 2 1A′, and 1 1A″) lowest-lying electronic singlet states of AlOH have been systematically investigated employing ab initio self-consistent-field, configuration interaction with single and double excitations, coupled cluster with single and double excitations (CCSD), CCSD with perturbative triple excitations [CCSD(T)], and CCSD with iterative partial triple excitations (CCSDT-3 and CC3) quantum mechanical methods with basis sets up to augmented correlation consistent polarized valence quadruple zeta (aug-cc-pVQZ). The linear Σ+1 state is found to be a remarkably low-energy transition state between the two equivalent bent 1 1A′ structures, while the linear Π1 state is a second-order saddle point, which leads to the bent 2 1A′ and 1 1A″ states. The bent ground (X̃ 1A′) state of AlOH is predicted to have a bond angle of 157° at the aug-cc-pVQZ CC3 level of theory and is classified as a quasilinear molecule, confirming previous studies. Employing the equation-of-motion coupled cluster method, the first singlet excited state (à 1A′) is predicted to have a bond angle of 110° and to lie 114 kcal/mol (39 900 cm−1, 4.94 eV) above the ground state, whereas the second singlet excited state (B̃ 1A″) is predicted to have a bond angle of 116° and to be located 119 kcal/mol (41 700 cm−1, 5.17 eV) above the ground state. These theoretical energy separations are in excellent agreement with the experimental values T0 (à 1A′)=114.57 kcal/mol (40 073 cm−1, 4.968 eV) and T0 (B̃ 1A″)=119.36 kcal/mol (41 747 cm−1, 5.176 eV). The barriers to linearity for the two bent singlet excited states are determined to be 11.6 kcal/mol for the à 1A′ state and 6.2 kcal/mol for the B̃ 1A″ state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: