Key result
This review appraises the evidence regarding alternative dual antiplatelet therapy regimens, including prasugrel or ticagrelor, to optimize platelet inhibition in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Why the study?
Do alternative dual antiplatelet therapy regimens improve outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard aspirin and clopidogrel?
Do alternative dual antiplatelet therapy regimens improve outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard aspirin and clopidogrel?
This review highlights the rationale and evidence for using alternative dual antiplatelet therapy regimens, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor, to overcome platelet hyper-reactivity and reduce ischemic events in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support alternative DAPT consideration in diabetes with ACS/PCI; leaves open dedicated outcome trials before practice change.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with higher rates of ischemic events in patients suffering from an acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, thereby underscoring the need to develop more effective and specific strategies toward mitigation of the cardiovascular burden associated with DM. Platelet hyper-reactivity associated with DM is a central contributor to this high risk, since platelets are the key players in the processes underpinning atherothrombotic complications, thereby representing a specific therapeutic target. Oral dual antiplatelet therapy comprising the combination of aspirin (75-100 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) has been, for years, the standard antithrombotic treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, despite the use of this therapy, high rates of cardiovascular events continue to occur, especially within the cohort of patients with DM. These observations could be in part explained by an inadequate clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition, which has been associated with impaired clinical outcomes. In particular, DM is associated with a higher prevalence of reduced responsiveness to standard dual antiplatelet therapy, which may contribute to the higher rates of ischemic events seen in this population. These findings have prompted the identification of alternative dual antiplatelet treatment regimens to optimize platelet inhibition. The present review aims to describe benefits and limitations of oral dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (75 mg) and to appraise the evidence regarding alternative oral dual antiplatelet therapy regimens, which include higher doses of aspirin and clopidogrel or the combination of prasugrel or ticagrelor with aspirin, focusing on patients with DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capranzano et al. (2013) conducted a review in Diabetes mellitus with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Alternative oral dual antiplatelet therapy regimens (higher doses of aspirin/clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) vs. Standard oral dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 75-100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg) was evaluated. This review appraises the evidence regarding alternative dual antiplatelet therapy regimens, including prasugrel or ticagrelor, to optimize platelet inhibition in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: