Mass balances for carbon (as COD), nitrogen, and phosphorus are excellent tools for the evaluation of WWTPs in order to estimate fluxes of these substances, to compare operational data of different WWTPs with one another and, finally, to draw conclusions of general validity. In the case of activated sludge systems, mass balances can also be very helpful for model calibration, in particular for the ‘Activated Sludge Model No. 1’ (ASM1), because this model is consequently based on balances for COD and nitrogen. Hence, the results of mass balances can be utilised directly for the estimation of model parameters. Accordingly, it is recommended to evaluate the fluxes of COD and nitrogen, before the model calibration is started. By means of mass balances only the state of equilibrium can be described. Therefore, as regards model calibration, only parameters responsible for long-term behaviour can be estimated, i.e. the heterotrophic yield Y H , the fraction of biomass yielding particulate organics f P , the heterotrophic decay rate b H and the concentration of particulate inert organics X I in the influent. A correct estimate of these parameters is a prerequisite for the validity of the simulation results, not only in regard to excess sludge production and SRT, but also with respect to the oxygen consumption for carbon removal and, therefore, to denitrification capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1999 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: