The reaction 16O(1D)+H2 18O→16OH(16f)+18OH( 18f) yields product molecules with internal [i.e., rotational (j), electronic (Ω), and vibrational (v)] levels 16f and 18f. The corresponding populations 16P(16f) and 18P(18f) are determined experimentally by photochemical preparation of reactants and detection of products after a 10 ns delay. Using this information, we predict the joint probabilities P(18f,16f) of observing the product pair simultaneously. For this purpose, we exploit that (a) summations of the less resolved joint vibrational probabilities P(18v,16v) over 18v or 16v yield exactly the observed vibrational populations 16P(16v) or 18P(18v), respectively; (b) a fraction of the nonvibrational energy of the (18v,16v) pair is released as rotational energy; and (c) the product molecules rotate with approximately opposite angular momenta 16j≊−18j due to the kinematics of light atom transfer. Imposing the constraints (a)–(c), information theory is used to determine P(18f,16f) such that the summations over 18f or 16f yield optimal agreement with the experimental 16P(16f) or 18P(18f), respectively. The results show that (a) simultaneous vibrational excitation of the product pair is negligible, i.e., vibrational energy release is very specific; (c) specific rotational energy release increases with vibrational excitation; and (c) the internal distribution of vibrationally excited OH radicals also contributes to the internal distributions of their v = 0 partners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Comes et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: