PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2004The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Editorial: Growth Hormone Treatment of “Idiopathic Short Stature”: Not So Fast

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does growth hormone treatment increase ultimate height in children with idiopathic short stature?

Population

Children and adolescents with idiopathic short stature

Comparison

Growth hormone (GH) treatment vs Placebo or historical controls

Design

Editorial

Key result

Growth hormone treatment for 4.4 years in children with idiopathic short stature increased ultimate height by a mean of 3.7 cm, but raises concerns regarding long-term risks and costs.

Authors

MFMichael Freemark

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Does not support routine use in idiopathic short stature; leaves open long-term safety and cost-effectiveness questions.

Structured PICO

Does growth hormone treatment increase ultimate height in children with idiopathic short stature?

P
Population
Children and adolescents with idiopathic short stature
I
Intervention
Growth hormone (GH) treatment
C
Comparator
Placebo or historical controls
O
Outcome
Ultimate/final adult height

Main Result

Mean Difference: 3.7

The editorial argues that while GH treatment slightly increases final height in idiopathic short stature, the modest benefit (approx. 1.5 inches) may not justify the high costs and potential long-term metabolic risks.

Limitations

  • Long-term risks of prolonged treatment with higher doses of GH are unknown
  • Increases in fasting glucose concentrations raise safety concerns
  • High economic burden and costs of therapy
  • Ethical concerns regarding the medicalization of short stature

Cite This Study

Michael Freemark (2004) conducted an editorial in Idiopathic short stature. Growth Hormone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Ultimate height (MD 3.7 cm). Growth hormone treatment for 4.4 years in children with idiopathic short stature increased ultimate height by a mean of 3.7 cm, but raises concerns regarding long-term risks and costs.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9710d86b29a448da82576bhttps://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-0671
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share