Key result
Interferential electrical stimulation applied prior to exercise significantly reduced estimated muscle metaboreflex control compared to placebo (6 vs 21 units; p<0.01) in healthy individuals.
Why the study?
Does interferential electrical stimulation improve peripheral vasodilatation and attenuate metaboreflex activation in healthy individuals?
RCT (n=11)
Does interferential electrical stimulation improve peripheral vasodilatation and attenuate metaboreflex activation in healthy individuals?
Acute application of interferential electrical stimulation prior to exercise attenuates the increase in blood pressure and vasoconstriction during exercise in healthy subjects.
May blunt metaboreflex in healthy subjects during exercise; leaves open translation to patients with cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND: Interferential electrical stimulation (IES), which may be linked to greater penetration of deep tissue, may restore blood flow by sympathetic nervous modulation; however, studies have found no association between the frequency and duration of the application and blood flow. We hypothesized that 30 min of IES applied to the ganglion stellate region might improve blood flow redistribution. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of IES on metaboreflex activation in healthy individuals. METHOD: Interferential electrical stimulation or a placebo stimulus (same protocol without electrical output) was applied to the stellate ganglion region in eleven healthy subjects (age 25±1.3 years) prior to exercise. Mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), calf blood flow (CBF) and calf vascular resistance (CVR) were measured throughout exercise protocols (submaximal static handgrip exercise) and with recovery periods with or without postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO+ and PECO -, respectively). Muscle metaboreflex control of calf vascular resistance was estimated by subtracting the area under the curve when circulation was occluded from the area under the curve from the AUC without circulatory occlusion. RESULTS: At peak exercise, increases in mean blood pressure were attenuated by IES (p<0.05), and the effect persisted under both the PECO+ and PECO- treatments. IES promoted higher CBF and lower CVR during exercise and recovery. Likewise, IES induced a reduction in the estimated muscle metaboreflex control (placebo, 21±5 units vs. IES, 6±3, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Acute application of IES prior to exercise attenuates the increase in blood pressure and vasoconstriction during exercise and metaboreflex activation in healthy subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in healthy individuals (n=11). Interferential electrical stimulation vs. placebo stimulus was evaluated on estimated muscle metaboreflex control (p=<0.01). Interferential electrical stimulation applied prior to exercise significantly reduced estimated muscle metaboreflex control compared to placebo (6 vs 21 units; p<0.01) in healthy individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: