We show that the length scale α^-1, which appears in the interfacial binding potential of the effective Hamiltonian description of wetting transitions, should be identified with the ``true'' or exponential range of the pair-correlation function of the bulk (wetting) phase, rather than the Ornstein-Zernike (second-moment) bulk correlation length ξb. Since α^-1>ξb, this implies that the parameter {ω}=kBTα²/4{π}{Σ} ̃ \~{}{}, which determines the values of critical exponents for critical wetting in three dimensions, is significantly smaller than initial estimates of this quantity. For the simple-cubic Ising model ({α}ξb{)}^{{{-}}1}1.46 for T{T}R$, the roughening temperature, and depending on the magnitude of the interfacial stiffness {Σ} ̃ \~{}{}, we conclude {ω}{}0.5 is appropriate for such temperatures. We discuss the implications for recent Monte Carlo studies of critical wetting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evans et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: