Why the study?
Does strain gauge plethysmography accurately exclude deep vein thrombosis in patients with suspected DVT compared to Doppler ultrasound?
Does strain gauge plethysmography accurately exclude deep vein thrombosis in patients with suspected DVT compared to Doppler ultrasound?
Strain gauge plethysmography has a 90% negative predictive value for DVT and can be used as a screening tool, but should not be the sole method of assessment.
Suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common reason for medical referral to hospital. Clinical signs and symptoms are notoriously unreliable, hence there is the need for objective testing. Strain gauge plethysmography (SGP) has been marketed as a technique for excluding lower limb DVT. We therefore set out to evaluate this screening tool. Over a 2 year period, 437 consecutive patients referred with suspected DVT were assessed using both plethysmography and Doppler ultrasound. When the two techniques were compared, plethysmography was found to have a negative predictive value of 90%. We conclude that strain gauge plethysmography has a role in the screening of patients with suspected DVT but should not be used as the sole method in patient assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: