Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An automated microELISA Reader was evaluated for its ability to read and interpret microtitre plates. A total of 309 microtitre plates were investigated by automated and visual methods. There was disagreement between the methods in one hundred and twelve (0.6%) wells. However agreements between the two methods for susceptibility tests and Enterobacteriaceae identification were respectively 98.8% and 89.3%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Courcol et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: