Key result
In patients undergoing minimal-access aortic valve replacement, a body mass index ≥25 did not significantly extend overall hospital stay (p=0.68) compared to normal-weight patients, supporting its safety and feasibility in overweight and obese populations.
Why the study?
Does BMI affect post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing minimal-access aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=90)
Yes
Does BMI affect post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing minimal-access aortic valve replacement?
Minimal-access aortic valve replacement is safe and effective in overweight and obese patients, with clinical outcomes comparable to normal-weight patients.
Does not indicate BMI-driven prolongation of stay after minimal-access AVR; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Minimal-access aortic valve replacement (MAAVR) may reduce post-operative blood loss and transfusion requirements, decrease post-operative pain, shorten length stay and enhance cosmesis. This may be particularly advantageous in overweight/obese patients, who are at increased risk of post-operative complications. Obese patients are however often denied MAAVR due to the perceived technical procedural difficulty. This retrospective analysis sought to determine the effect of BMI on post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing MAAVR. METHODS: Ninety isolated elective MAAVR procedures performed between May 2006-October 2013 were included. Intra- and post-operative data were prospectively collected. Ordinary least squares univariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of BMI as a continuous variable on post-operative outcomes. One-way ANOVA and Chi-squared testing was used to assess differences in outcomes between patients with BMI <25 (n = 36) and BMI ≥25 (n = 54) as appropriate. RESULTS: There was no peri-operative mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke. Univariate regression demonstrated longer cross-clamp times (p = 0.0218) and a trend towards increased bypass times (p = 0.0615) in patients with higher BMI. BMI ≥25 was associated with an increased incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia (p = 0.020) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (p = 0.036) compared to BMI <25. However, raised BMI did not extend ICU (p = 0.3310) or overall hospital stay (p = 0.2614). Similar rates of sternal wound complications, inotrope requirements and renal dysfunction were observed in both normal- and overweight/obese-BMI groups. Furthermore, increasing BMI correlated with reduced mechanical ventilation time (p = 0.039) and early post-operative blood loss (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that within the range of this study, MAAVR is a safe, reproducible and effective procedure, affording equivalent clinical outcomes in both overweight/obese and normal-weight patients considered for an isolated first-time AVR, with low post-operative morbidity and mortality. MAAVR should therefore be considered as an alternative surgical strategy to reduce obesity-related complications in patients requiring aortic valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease requiring elective isolated MAAVR (n=90). Body mass index ≥25 (overweight/obese) vs. Body mass index <25 (normal weight) was evaluated on Overall hospital stay (p=0.68). In patients undergoing minimal-access aortic valve replacement, a body mass index ≥25 did not significantly extend overall hospital stay (p=0.68) compared to normal-weight patients, supporting its safety and feasibility in overweight and obese populations.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: