Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thermolysis of the rhodium(III) complex [(dm‐Phebox‐dm)Rh(OAc)2(H2O)] [1; dm‐Phebox‐dm = 2,6‐bis(4,4‐dimethyloxazolinyl)phenyl] in various arenes results in the formation of the corresponding aryl complexes [(dm‐Phebox‐dm)Rh(Ar)(κ2‐OAc)] [Ar = C6H5 (2), 3,5‐Me2C6H3 (3), 3,4‐Me2C6H3 (4), C6H4Me (5), C6H4CF3 (6), C6H4OMe (7), C6H4COMe (8), C6H4Cl (9)]. The reaction of 1 with monosubstituted benzenes such as toluene, anisole, acetophenone, trifluorotoluene, and chlorobenzene produces a mixture of meta‐ and para‐activated complexes, the ratio of which depends on the substituents on the benzene ring. The relative rate of the reaction of 1 with monosubstituted benzenes C6H5X was determined to be: X = OMe (1.8) > COMe (1.6) > CF3 (1.2), Cl (1.2) > CH3 (1). The acetato ligand of 1 appears to be essential for C–H bond activation of arenes as no reaction of the RhIII complex [(dm‐Phebox‐dm)RhCl2(H2O)] is observed in chlorobenzene at 120 °C. The first‐order rate constants obtained by thermolysis of 1 in [D8]toluene at 97.1–116.5 °C yielded the following activation parameters: ΔH‡ = 22(2) kcal mol–1, ΔS‡ = –24(5) cal mol–1 K–1. The kinetic isotope effect for the C–H bond activation of toluene by 1 was determined to be kH/kD = 5.4 at 100 °C. These data suggest that the rate‐determining step involves the C–H bond cleavage with a rigid, cyclic transition structure. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2007)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ito et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: