Key result
The PREPARE prehabilitation program prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy significantly reduced the median length of hospital stay (7 vs. 8 days, P=0.039) and ICU readmission rate (3.8% vs. 16.3%, P=0.039).
Why the study?
Postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy remains substantial, and the influence of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was unknown.
Does a multimodal prehabilitation program improve postoperative recovery and reduce morbidity in patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy?
Cohort (n=95)
No
Does a multimodal prehabilitation program improve postoperative recovery and reduce morbidity in patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy?
A multimodal prehabilitation program prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy significantly reduces length of hospital stay and ICU readmissions.
Supports prehabilitation before esophagectomy; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
Postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy remains substantial. Studies in major abdominal surgery have shown that prehabilitation can improve postoperative outcomes. This single-center study investigated the influence of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL). Data were collected on patients that underwent a MIE-IL and received a fully standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program, between October 2015 and February 2020. The intervention group comprised patients enrolled in the PREPARE prehabilitation program. The control group comprised a retrospective cohort with similar ERAS care, prior to implementation of PREPARE. Postoperative outcomes included (functional) recovery, length of hospital stay (LOHS), cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and other predefined outcomes. The PREPARE group comprised 52 and control group 43 patients. Median time to functional recovery was 6 vs. 7 days (P = 0.074) and LOHS 7 vs. 8 days (P = 0.039) in PREPARE and control patients, respectively. Hospital readmission rate was 9.6 vs. 14.3% (P = 0.484). A 17% reduction in thirty-day overall postoperative complication rate was observed in PREPARE patients, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.106). Similarly, a clinically relevant reduction of 14% in CPC rate was observed (P = 0.190). Anastomotic leakage rate was similar (9.6 vs 14.0%; P = 0.511). Despite no difference in severity (Clavien-Dindo) of complications (P = 0.311), ICU readmission rate was lower in PREPARE patients (3.8 vs. 16.3%, P = 0.039). Prehabilitation prior to MIE-IL led to a shorter LOHS and reduced ICU readmission rate. Additionally, a clinically relevant improvement in postoperative recovery and reduced morbidity rate was observed in prehabilitated patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janssen et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL) (n=95). PREPARE prehabilitation program vs. Retrospective cohort with similar ERAS care prior to PREPARE implementation was evaluated on Length of hospital stay (days) (p=0.039). The PREPARE prehabilitation program prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy significantly reduced the median length of hospital stay (7 vs. 8 days, P=0.039) and ICU readmission rate (3.8% vs. 16.3%, P=0.039).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: