Key result
Electrocardiographically gated multidetector CT permitted large-vessel distensibility measurements in a phantom model (mean difference -0.47% to 0.14%) and demonstrated feasibility in 4 patients.
Why the study?
Can electrocardiographically gated multidetector CT accurately measure large-vessel distensibility compared to optical measurements in a phantom model, and is it feasible in humans?
Can electrocardiographically gated multidetector CT accurately measure large-vessel distensibility compared to optical measurements in a phantom model, and is it feasible in humans?
Electrocardiographically gated multidetector CT is feasible for measuring large-vessel distensibility, showing high agreement with optical measurements in a phantom model.
Pilot data affirm technical feasibility; leaves open clinical utility pending larger validation studies.
The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine vessel distensibility measurements by using electrocardiographically gated multidetector computed tomography (CT) in a phantom compared with measurements by using a digital camera and to examine feasibility in humans. Large-vessel phantoms were constructed, using a pulsatile flow pump, and absolute diameter and percentage diameter changes during pulsation were measured. After institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained, the abdominal aorta of four patients was scanned with an electrocardiographically gated CT protocol. The mean difference in percentage diameter change between CT and optical measurements for the phantom ranged from -0.47% to 0.14%. The range of area changes in five locations along the abdominal aorta in four patients was 2.97%-37.16%. Findings of this study indicate that electrocardiographically gated CT angiography data reconstructed across cardiac phases permit measurements of large-vessel distensibility in a phantom model and that vessel distensibility measurement in humans may be possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2007) studied this question. Electrocardiographically gated multidetector computed tomography (CT) vs. Digital camera (in phantom model) was evaluated on Percentage diameter change and area changes. Electrocardiographically gated multidetector CT permitted large-vessel distensibility measurements in a phantom model (mean difference -0.47% to 0.14%) and demonstrated feasibility in 4 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: