Key result
An intensive educational intervention is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to determine its effect on time in therapeutic INR range among warfarin-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does an intensive educational intervention improve time in therapeutic INR range in warfarin-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=200)
Single-blind
Computer generated list in blocks of four with stratification
Yes
Does an intensive educational intervention improve time in therapeutic INR range in warfarin-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation?
This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial evaluating whether an intensive educational intervention improves time in therapeutic range for warfarin-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation.
RCT underway to test intensive education on TTR in new warfarin users with AF; leaves open whether it improves control.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a high risk of stroke are recommended anticoagulation with warfarin. However, the benefit of warfarin is dependent upon time spent within the target therapeutic range (TTR) of their international normalised ratio (INR) (2.0 to 3.0). AF patients possess limited knowledge of their disease and warfarin treatment and this can impact on INR control. Education can improve patients' understanding of warfarin therapy and factors which affect INR control. METHODS/DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial of an intensive educational intervention will consist of group sessions (between 2-8 patients) containing standardised information about the risks and benefits associated with OAC therapy, lifestyle interactions and the importance of monitoring and control of their International Normalised Ratio (INR). Information will be presented within an 'expert-patient' focussed DVD, revised educational booklet and patient worksheets. 200 warfarin-naïve patients who are eligible for warfarin will be randomised to either the intervention or usual care groups. All patients must have ECG-documented AF and be eligible for warfarin (according to the NICE AF guidelines). Exclusion criteria include: aged < 18 years old, contraindication(s) to warfarin, history of warfarin USE, valvular heart disease, cognitive impairment, are unable to speak/read English and disease likely to cause death within 12 months. Primary endpoint is time spent in TTR. Secondary endpoints include measures of quality of life (AF-QoL-18), anxiety and depression (HADS), knowledge of AF and anticoagulation, beliefs about medication (BMQ) and illness representations (IPQ-R). Clinical outcomes, including bleeding, stroke and interruption to anticoagulation will be recorded. All outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and 1, 2, 6 and 12 months post-intervention. DISCUSSION: More data is needed on the clinical benefit of educational intervention with AF patients receiving warfarin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN93952605.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Atrial Fibrillation (n=200). Intensive educational intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Proportion of time spent in the therapeutic INR range (2.0 to 3.0). An intensive educational intervention is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to determine its effect on time in therapeutic INR range among warfarin-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: