Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether a successful asthma-management program could be translated into pediatrician's offices, improve care, and reduce medical services use. METHODS: Pediatrician's offices from 6 communities in Connecticut were trained, and all children aged 6 months or older were eligible for enrollment. Quality measures included enrollment numbers, appropriate use of anti-inflammatory therapy, and distribution of a written treatment plan. Medical services utilization data for Medicaid-insured children were expressed as relative rates (RRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) before and after enrollment, and we used historical and contemporaneous comparisons and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: A total of 51 practices and 297 clinicians enrolled 32 680 children from 2002 to 2007; 10 467 had asthma, of whom 4354 were insured with Medicaid. Children with persistent asthma experienced decreases in the number of hospitalizations (RR: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.39-0.65]) and emergency-department visits (RR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.68-0.84]), and there was no change in number of outpatient visits (RR: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.9-1.10]). Inhaled corticosteroid use doubled, appropriate use of anti-inflammatory therapy increased to 96%, and 94% of the children were given a written treatment plan. CONCLUSIONS: General pediatricians can successfully implement an asthma-management program that is effective in improving care for large numbers of children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cloutier et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: