Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates interactive effects of creatine and sulfur amino acids on carcass quality in finishing pigs, highlighting the need for balanced amino acid nutrition.
This study aimed to evaluate the interaction between creatine monohydrate (CMH) and standardized ileal digestible (SID) methionine + cysteine (Met+Cys) in finishing pig diets on the performance, carcass traits, pork quality, blood biochemistry, gene expression of creatine transporter and muscle antioxidant action. Forty gilts, averaging 75.26±0.87 kg of initial weight, were distributed in a randomized blocks design, arranged in a 2 x 2 factorial scheme, consisting of two dietary CMH supplementation (0 and 0.10%) and two SID Met+Cys levels (0.40 and 0.44%), with 10 replicates and one animal per experimental unit. There was no interaction between CMH and SID Met+Cys on the performance and SLC6A8 gene expression (P>0.05). However, interactions were observed for the backfat thickness at P3 (P=0.004), drip water loss (DL) (P=0.018), thawing water loss (TL) (P=0.042) and plasma creatinine concentration (P=0.03). Supplementation with CMH provided low fat deposition at P3 point. Diets with the lowest SID Met+Cys level (0.40%) and containing CMH (0.10%) presented the highest water losses (DL and TL). Plasma creatinine concentration was lower in pigs receiving diets with 0.10% CMH than those not receiving, but only in diets containing 0.44% SID Met+Cys. In addition, 0.44% SID Met+Cys increased the percentage of inhibition of the DPPH radical (P=0.022). The effects of supplementing 0.10% CMH in finishing pig diets are evident on pork quality by using adequate levels of SID Met+Cys, which also assist in preventing the oxidative lipid damage in the Longissimus dorsi muscle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pozza et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: