Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A goodness-of-fit statistic D 2 is introduced for use in multinomial distributions. Pearson's X2 and D 2 are both approximately normally distributed when the sample size N is not large relative to the number of multinomial categories k. Under sequences of local alternative hypotheses the test based on D 2 exhibits moderate power when the X2 test is biased. Application is made to the analysis of large sparse contingency tables. A theorem is presented that describes the likelihood ratio Λ for testing a simple multinomial distribution against a mixture of multinomial distributions. A wide variety of mixing distributions is considered, and the D 2 statistic is a special case of log Λ when testing for Dirichlet mixtures of multinomial distributions. In the case where N is large, relative to k, X2 and D 2 + k behave approximately as chi-squared random variables and differ by a very small amount under the null hypothesis. In this situation X2 and D 2 + k will generally yield the same inference. With a large, sparse multinomial distribution where N and k are both large, X2 and D 2 will usually behave as normal random variables with means and variances that are unrelated to the chi-squared distribution. In the sparse distribution, X2 and D 2 are not equivalent and X2 will accept the null hypothesis too often under certain alternative hypotheses. When testing for independence of rows and columns in a large, sparse two-dimensional contingency table, estimate the cell means conditional on the marginal totals in the usual manner. The [Dcirc]2 statistic resulting from substituting these estimated means for the cell means is highly correlated with D 2. The normalizing mean and variance of [Dcirc]2 under the null hypothesis of independence are given at the end of the article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Zelterman (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: