Key result
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis than warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (aHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.97).
Why the study?
Warfarin affects bone mineral density and causes osteoporosis, but studies investigating the relationship between NOACs and osteoporosis are limited.
Do NOACs reduce the risk of osteoporosis compared to warfarin in adult patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=17,008)
Yes
Do NOACs reduce the risk of osteoporosis compared to warfarin in adult patients with atrial fibrillation?
In patients with atrial fibrillation, the use of NOACs (specifically rivaroxaban and apixaban) is associated with a significantly lower risk of incident osteoporosis compared to warfarin.
Should not yet alter anticoagulant choice in AF; extends observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Background Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, has been shown to affect bone mineral density and cause osteoporosis. However, studies investigating the relationship between non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) and osteoporosis are limited. We thus compared the risk of osteoporosis in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with either NOAC s or warfarin. Methods and Results This nationwide, retrospective cohort study used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. All adult patients in Taiwan who were newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and treated with NOAC s or warfarin between January 2012 and December 2015 were included and classified into their respective cohorts. Patients who received NOAC s were subcategorized into the rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban subgroups. Propensity score matching was performed for each head‐to‐head comparison. Adjusted hazard ratios ( aHR s) for the risk of osteoporosis were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models, with adjustment for confounders. Overall, 17 008 patients were included, with 8504 in each cohort. NOAC s were associated with a lower osteoporosis risk than warfarin ( aHR =0.82; 95% CI=0.68–0.97). A subgroup effect of treatment duration was identified (namely, the lower osteoporosis risk with NOAC compared with warfarin became stronger in those with longer treatment duration [ P for interaction <0.001]). Furthermore, significantly lower risks of osteoporosis were observed in the rivaroxaban ( aHR =0.68; 95% CI =0.55–0.83) and apixaban ( aHR =0.38; 95% CI =0.22–0.66) subgroups, but not in the dabigatran subgroup ( aHR =1.04; 95% CI =0.85–1.27). Conclusions Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban and apixaban were associated with a significantly lower risk of osteoporosis in patients with atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in atrial fibrillation (n=17,008). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on risk of osteoporosis (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.97). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis than warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (aHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: