Key result
Prothrombin time of heparinase-treated blood during CPB showed unsatisfactory agreement with post-protamine samples, but a PT ≤16 s or ≥18 s predicted FFP needs with ≥83% or ≥93% probability.
Why the study?
Does in vitro heparinase treatment of blood during CPB provide prothrombin time results that agree with post-protamine measurements to predict FFP requirement in adults undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=158)
Does in vitro heparinase treatment of blood during CPB provide prothrombin time results that agree with post-protamine measurements to predict FFP requirement in adults undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery?
Prothrombin time measurements from heparinase-treated blood during cardiopulmonary bypass can predict the need for fresh frozen plasma post-bypass, potentially reducing delays in coagulation factor replacement.
May not yet guide FFP transfusion; supports validation of heparinase PT thresholds in cardiac surgery.
The prothrombin time (PT) is useful for identifying coagulation factor deficits after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, long processing times and the need for fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to be thawed cause delays in factor replacement. We hypothesized that, by treating with heparinase, blood sampled toward the end of CPB can provide PT results that help to determine the requirement for FFP after CPB. Laboratory delays can be eliminated with point-of-care monitors. We studied 158 adults undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery. Blood taken before separation from CPB was mixed with heparinase, and PT was measured in the laboratory with a HemoTec timer. Agreements between these results and laboratory measurements of blood taken after systemic protamine were compared by using Bland and Altman plots with the threshold of ±1.0 s. We found that the laboratory PT measurements during CPB versus after CPB were compara-ble, but the limits of agreement exceeded these thresholds. Similarly, there was unsatisfactory agreement between the HemoTec and laboratory PT results measured before, during, and after CPB. For each PT measured during CPB, the corresponding confidence interval for the postprotamine PT was calculated. During CPB, a laboratory PT of ≤16 s or ≥18 s suggests a ≥83% or ≥93% probability of not requiring or potentially requiring, respectively, FFP after CPB. We conclude that the majority of PT measurements obtained from blood taken before weaning from CPB and treated in vitro with heparinase was associated with a high probability of whether or not FFP would be needed after CPB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Nonemergent cardiac surgery (n=158). In vitro heparinase treatment of blood during CPB vs. Blood sampled after CPB and systemic protamine was evaluated on Agreement between PT measurements using Bland and Altman plots with a threshold of ±1.0 s. Prothrombin time of heparinase-treated blood during CPB showed unsatisfactory agreement with post-protamine samples, but a PT ≤16 s or ≥18 s predicted FFP needs with ≥83% or ≥93% probability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: