Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The cable model for electrical stimulation near the terminal of a passive fiber is derived for excitation by an arbitrary, time-varying, applied extracellular field. Unless the termination impedance is comparable to that of mammalian node of Ranvier, the end-conditions require the longitudinal intracellular current at the fiber terminal to be negligibly small. This requirement substantially alters the membrane potential profile from that obtained with a fiber of infinite length. Stimulation near the end of a fiber may result in lower thresholds and may reverse the anodal/cathodal threshold ratio obtained with stimulation in the mid-portion of the fiber. Chronaxie for stimulation near the terminal may be much smaller than at a distance from the terminal and the strength-duration curve may be nonmonotonic. These differences may have significant implications for any application of electrical stimulation where fiber terminations may play a role in the excitatory process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jay T. Rubinstein (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: