Key result
Inhaled isoetharine HCl increased bronchial blood flow from 22 to 60 ml/min (P < 0.001) in anesthetized sheep, an effect partially mediated by nitric oxide synthesis.
Inhaled isoetharine increases bronchial blood flow in a dose-dependent manner, an effect that is partially mediated by the synthesis of nitric oxide.
Should not guide human therapy; leaves open NO mediation of bronchial flow in patients.
We studied the dose-dependent effects of inhaled isoetharine HCl, a beta-adrenergic bronchodilator (2.5, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 mg), on bronchial blood flow (Qbr) in anesthetized sheep. Isoetharine resulted in a dose-dependent increase in Qbr. With a total dose of 17.5 mg, Qbr increased from baseline values of 22 +/- 3.4 (SE) to 60 +/- 16 ml/min (P < 0.001), an effect independent of changes in cardiac output and systemic arterial pressure. To further study whether synthesis of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) affects beta-agonist-induced increases in Qbr, we administered isoetharine (20 mg) by inhalation before and after the NO-synthase inhibitor N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Intravenous L-NAME (30 mg/kg) rapidly decreased Qbr by approximately 80% of baseline, whereas L-NAME via inhalation (10 mg/kg) resulted in a delayed and smaller (approximately 22%) decrease. Pretreatment with L-NAME via both routes of administration attenuated bronchial arterial vasodilation after subsequent challenge with isoetharine. We conclude that isoetharine via inhalation increases Qbr in a dose-dependent manner and that beta-agonist-induced relaxation of vascular smooth muscle in the bronchial vasculature is partially mediated via synthesis of NO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (1998) studied this question. Inhaled isoetharine HCl vs. Baseline was evaluated on Bronchial blood flow (Qbr) (p=< 0.001). Inhaled isoetharine HCl increased bronchial blood flow from 22 to 60 ml/min (P < 0.001) in anesthetized sheep, an effect partially mediated by nitric oxide synthesis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: