Key result
This review discusses the published literature on the etiology and pharmacologic prevention of atrial fibrillation following coronary bypass surgery.
Why the study?
Do pharmacologic therapies prevent atrial fibrillation in patients after coronary bypass surgery?
Do pharmacologic therapies prevent atrial fibrillation in patients after coronary bypass surgery?
This review summarizes the etiology and pharmacologic prevention strategies for atrial fibrillation following coronary bypass surgery.
Evidence on post-CABG AF prevention remains inconclusive; leaves open optimal pharmacologic strategies pending new trials.
Coronary bypass surgery is performed on over 400,000 patients each year in the United States. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication after bypass surgery. The significance of its occurrence lies not only in the potentially dangerous and physiologic derangement to patients, but also in the impact it has on the utilization of health care resources. Several clinical observations suggest that the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after bypass surgery has some unique features related to the perioperative circumstances. Numerous therapies, both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic have been tested to prevent this tenacious problem. Its persistence continues to intrigue cardio-thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists and the insurers alike. In this review we discuss the published literature on postbypass AF, with a special emphasis on pharmacologic prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayam et al. (2002) conducted a review in Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Bypass. Pharmacologic prevention was evaluated. This review discusses the published literature on the etiology and pharmacologic prevention of atrial fibrillation following coronary bypass surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: