Key result
Ang/Tie-2 inhibitors represent a novel anti-angiogenic strategy for cancer therapy, with several agents currently in various stages of clinical development.
Why the study?
Do Ang/Tie-2 inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with malignancies?
Do Ang/Tie-2 inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with malignancies?
Ang/Tie-2 inhibitors represent a novel anti-angiogenic strategy in cancer therapy that may be best utilized in combination with other agents, provided toxicity is manageable.
INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, several anti-angiogenic strategies have been devised to target a wide spectrum of malignancies. The most widely utilized approach involves abrogation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling through either consumption of ligand (i.e., with the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab) or through direct inhibition of the receptor tyrosine kinase domain (i.e., with small molecules such as sunitinib or sorafenib). While these agents do appear to delay cancer progression in the clinic, they are not curative approaches. AREAS COVERED: A novel anti-angiogenic strategy involves inhibition of signaling along the Ang/Tie-2 axis, a pathway critical for mediating endothelial and perivascular cell interactions. While several agents (i.e., AMG-386 and regorafenib) have reached late stages of clinical development, others (i.e., ARRY614 and CEP-11981) are in their relative infancy. Herein, we will outline the clinical trajectory of wide spectrum Ang/Tie-2 inhibitors, with attention to data evaluating combinations with cytotoxic therapy or other targeted agents. EXPERT OPINION: Provided that these approaches to not drastically augment toxicity, they may represent the ideal path for further development of this class of agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eroglu et al. (2013) conducted a review in Cancer. Ang/Tie-2 inhibitors was evaluated. Ang/Tie-2 inhibitors represent a novel anti-angiogenic strategy for cancer therapy, with several agents currently in various stages of clinical development.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: