Key result
The Complete Entry and Re-entry Neutralization (CERN) protocol improved the rate of favorable aortic remodeling from 25% to 85% (P=0.0067) following endovascular treatment of aortic dissection.
Why the study?
Aneurysmal degeneration after aortic dissection remains unresolved because current treatment options fail to address known risk factors.
Does the Complete Entry and Re-entry Neutralization (CERN) protocol improve favorable aortic remodeling in patients undergoing endovascular treatment for aortic dissection?
Cohort (n=68)
Does the Complete Entry and Re-entry Neutralization (CERN) protocol improve favorable aortic remodeling in patients undergoing endovascular treatment for aortic dissection?
Absolute Event Rate: 85% vs 25%
p-value: p=0.0067
The CERN protocol significantly improves the rate of favorable aortic remodeling following endovascular treatment of diffused aortic dissection.
May support CERN protocol evaluation in aortic dissection; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
There have been indisputable developments in techniques for stabilizing acute aortic syndromes. However, aneurysmal degeneration following aortic dissection remains a problem to be solved. The currently available treatment options for aortic dissection still fail to take into account the known risk factors for aneurysmal degeneration. This is why we introduced a new approach to treating patients with an aortic dissection, called Complete Entry and Re-entry Neutralization (CERN). This is our initial report on the promising interim results. Material and Methods: 68 patients qualified for endovascular treatment of an acute or chronic aortic dissection. Computed tomography was performed post-operatively to assess aortic remodeling after 1/6/12/24/36 months. Results: the 30-day mortality rate was 4.4%. In 29 cases (43%) unfavorable remodeling was noted in the follow-up. The most important factors leading to unfavorable remodeling were: uncovered re-entry tear including the infra-renal segment, no relining of dissection membranes and insufficient coverage of the descending aorta. We analyzed these factors to develop the CERN protocol. This concept consists of six basic rules: A. cover all entry tears, B. amplify the BMS radial force, C. use the STABILISE technique, D. consider using thrombus plugs, E. avoid stenting the visceral branches, F. spare the intercostal and lumbar side branches. CERN improves the rate of favorable remodeling from 25% to 85% (P = 0.0067). Conclusion: Introduction of the Complete Entry and Re-entry Neutralization protocol improves the rate of favorable remodeling following endovascular treatment of aortic dissection in mid-term follow-up in patients with diffused aortic dissection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jędrzejczak et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute or chronic aortic dissection (n=68). Complete Entry and Re-entry Neutralization (CERN) protocol vs. Standard or previous approach was evaluated on Favorable remodeling (p=0.0067). The Complete Entry and Re-entry Neutralization (CERN) protocol improved the rate of favorable aortic remodeling from 25% to 85% (P=0.0067) following endovascular treatment of aortic dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: