Reaction of {[UO2Pys][mu-KI2Py2]}n (1) with 2 equiv of potassium dibenzoylmethanate (Kdbm) in pyridine or acetonitrile affords, respectively, the corresponding tetranuclear complexes of pentavalent uranyl ([UO2(dbm),2]2[mu-K(Py)2]2[mu8-K(Py)]}2I2 x Py2 (2) (in 70% yield) and {[UO2(dbm)2]2[mu-K(MeCN)2][mu8-K]}2 (3) (in 40% yield) in which four UO2+ are mutually coordinated (T-shaped "cation-cation" interaction). The X-ray structures of 2 and 3 show also the presence of, respectively, six and four potassium cations involved in UO2+...K+ interactions. Reaction of 2 with an excess of 18-crown-6 (18C6) affords the dimeric complex [UO2(dbm)2K(18C6)]2 (4) presenting a diamond-shaped interaction between two UO2+ groups, in 45% yield. 1H and PFGSTE diffusion NMR spectroscopy of 2 and 3 in pyridine show unambiguously the presence of UO2+...UO2+ and UO2+...K+ interactions (tetrametallic species) in solution, which leads to a rapid (7 days) disproportionation of pentavalent uranyl to afford [U(dbm)4] and [UO2(dbm)2] species. The UO2+...K+ interaction plays an important synergistic role in the stabilization of the UO2+...UO2+ interactions. Accordingly, the lower affinity of (K(18C6))+ for the uranyl(V) oxygen in complex 4 results in a lower number of coordinated K+ and therefore in a weakened UP2+...UO2+ interaction. The UO24+...UO2+ interactions is completely disrupted in dmso or in the presence of Kdbm, preventing disproportionation of pentavalent uranyl. Solid-state variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility studies showed the unambiguous presence of antiferromagnetic coupling between the two oxo-bridged uranium centers of complex 4, with the appearance of a maximum in chi versus T at approximately 5 K. The different behavior of the tetrameric complex 3, which probably involves a magnetic coupling occurring at lower temperature, can be ascribed to the different geometric arrangement of the interacting uranyl(V) groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nocton et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: