Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A kinetic study of hydrogen−deuterium (H/D) exchange in Pt(II)−1-methylimidazole complexes has been performed in D 2 O/NaOD solution, at 60 °C, by means of 1 H NMR spectroscopy. Isotopic exchange has been observed at C(2)−H, C(4)−H, and C(5)−H of the imidazole moiety. Kinetic data analysis of H/D exchange in the complexes cis -[Pt(NH 3 ) 2 (MeIm) 2 ]Cl 2 ( 3 ), trans -[Pt(NH 3 ) 2 (MeIm) 2 ]Cl 2 ( 4 ), [Pt(en)(MeIm) 2 ]Cl 2 ( 5 ), and [Pt(MeIm) 4 ](ClO 4 ) 2 ( 6 ) revealed that Pt(II) enhances C(2)−H exchange in the coordinated 1-methylimidazole (MeIm) by ca. 10 2 to 10 3, relative to the neutral substrate. However, it is ca. 10 4 −10 5 times less effective compared to H + and CH 3 + . In complex 5, C(5)−H exchange is ca. 6 times faster than C(4)−H exchange, in contrast with expectations based on an inductive/field effect by Pt(II). The observation of the relative reactivity order, C(5)−H exchange > C(4)−H exchange in 5, is discussed by consideration of contributing resonance structures of the intermediates formed upon abstraction of C(4)−H and C(5)−H, which would place the positive charge at the more favorable N(1)−CH 3 position. An X-ray crystal structure determination of 6 was also performed. The complex crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1̄, with a = 8.219(1) Å, b = 9.424(1) Å, c = 9.139(3) Å; α = 107.68(2)°, β = 83.72(2)°, γ = 114.87(1)°; and Z = 1. The complex has a center of symmetry with the 1-methylimidazole ligands coordinated in a square-planar arrangement around the Pt(II) atom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clement et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: