Key result
Prediction models combining clinical traits, gene expression, and damaged-gene scores significantly predicted treatment response to LABA (R2=0.512, p<0.001) and LAMA (R2=0.575, p<0.001) in COPD.
Why the study?
Can clinical traits, gene expressions, and damaged-gene scores predict treatment response to LABA or LAMA in patients with stable COPD?
RCT (n=65)
Open-label
random order
Can clinical traits, gene expressions, and damaged-gene scores predict treatment response to LABA or LAMA in patients with stable COPD?
Adding gene expression and damaged-gene scores to clinical traits improves the prediction of treatment response to long-acting bronchodilators in stable COPD.
Multi-omics models may guide LABA/LAMA selection in stable COPD; extends clinical prediction with gene expression and damage scores.
Purpose: There is currently no measure to predict a treatability of long-acting β-2 agonist (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to build prediction models for the treatment response to these bronchodilators, in order to determine the most responsive medication for patients with COPD. Methods: We performed a prospective open-label crossover study, in which each long-acting bronchodilator was given in a random order to 65 patients with stable COPD for 4 weeks, with a 4-week washout period in between. We analyzed 14 baseline clinical traits, expression profiles of 31,426 gene transcripts, and damaged-gene scores of 6,464 genes acquired from leukocytes. The gene expression profiles were measured by RNA microarray and the damaged-gene scores were obtained after DNA exome sequencing. Linear regression analyses were performed to build prediction models after using factor and correlation analyses. Results: Using a prediction model for a LABA, traits found associated with the treatment response were post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) to salbutamol, expression of three genes ( CLN8 , PCSK5 , and SKP2 ), and damage scores of four genes ( EPG5 , FNBP4 , SCN10A , and SPTBN5 ) ( R 2 =0.512, p <0.001). Traits associated with the treatment response to a LAMA were COPD assessment test score, BDR, expression of four genes ( C1orf115 , KIAA1618 , PRKX , and RHOQ ) and damage scores of three genes ( FBN3 , FDFT1 , and ZBED6 ) ( R 2 =0.575, p <0.001). The prediction models consisting only of clinical traits appeared too weak to predict the treatment response, with R 2 =0.231 for the LABA model and R 2 =0.121 for the LAMA model. Conclusion: Adding the expressions of genes and damaged-gene scores to the clinical traits may improve the predictability of treatment response to long-acting bronchodilators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in stable COPD (n=65). Long-acting bronchodilators (LABA and LAMA) was evaluated on Treatment response to LABA and LAMA (R2=0.512 (LABA) and R2=0.575 (LAMA), p=<0.001). Prediction models combining clinical traits, gene expression, and damaged-gene scores significantly predicted treatment response to LABA (R2=0.512, p<0.001) and LAMA (R2=0.575, p<0.001) in COPD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: