Why the study?
Does pharmacological manipulation of endogenous atriopeptin (by inhibiting cGMP phosphodiesterase or neutral endopeptidase) improve natriuresis and diuresis in A-V fistula animals with heart failure?
Does pharmacological manipulation of endogenous atriopeptin (by inhibiting cGMP phosphodiesterase or neutral endopeptidase) improve natriuresis and diuresis in A-V fistula animals with heart failure?
Inhibiting cGMP phosphodiesterase or neutral endopeptidase bypasses the suppressed renal response to exogenous atriopeptin in heart failure, providing a rational therapeutic strategy for diuresis.
Atrial stretch causes the release of atriopeptin (AP, ANF) from preformed vesicular storage sites. The circulating hormone acts on unique receptor sites (containing guanylate cyclase) to release guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) that mediates the natriuresis and vasodilation and probably the suppression of renin, aldosterone, and vasopressin. The biological effects of atriopeptin are transient because of the rapid inactivation of the circulating hormone (by neutral endopeptidase or clearance receptors) or the second messenger (by cGMP-phosphodiesterase). Heart failure due to chronic cardiac volume overload [aortovenocaval (A-V) fistula] exhibits markedly elevated circulating AP blood levels and urinary cGMP levels, accompanied by induction of ventricular AP gene and protein expression and release. Pharmacological manipulation of endogenous AP, either by inhibiting cGMP phosphodiesterase (i.e., mediator prolongation) or neutral endopeptidase (i.e., prolongation of hormone half-life) in A-V fistula animals results in profound natriuresis and diuresis without hypotension. These pharmacological maneuvers bypass the suppressed renal response to exogenous AP seen in heart failure and provide a rational therapeutic strategy based on our understanding of the underlying physiological and pathological mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilkins et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: