Key result
A biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent resulted in similar rates of major adverse cardiac events at 3 years compared to a durable polymer stent in STEMI patients (10.4% vs 11.9%, HR 0.772).
Why the study?
Does a biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent reduce major adverse cardiac events in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI compared to a durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent?
RCT (n=332)
Single-blind
Block randomization
No
Does a biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent reduce major adverse cardiac events in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI compared to a durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent?
Hazard Ratio: 0.772 (95% CI 0.458–1.337)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.4% vs 11.9%
p-value: p=0.728
Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents demonstrate comparable long-term efficacy and safety to durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Supports biodegradable polymer stents as a viable alternative in STEMI PCI; confirms comparable 3-year safety and efficacy versus durable polymer stents.
INTRODUCTION: With long-term follow-up, whether biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES) is efficient and safe in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a controversial issue. This study aims to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of DES in PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized single-blind study with 3-year follow-up was performed to compare biodegradable polymer DES with durable polymer DES in 332 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years after the procedure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, recurrent infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The secondary end points included in-segment late luminal loss (LLL) and binary restenosis at 9 months and cumulative stent thrombosis (ST) event rates up to 3 years. RESULTS: The rate of the primary end points and the secondary end points including major adverse cardiac events, in-segment late luminal loss, binary restenosis, and cumulative thrombotic event rates were comparable between biodegradable polymer DES and durable polymer DES in these 332 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Biodegradable polymer DES has similar efficacy and safety profiles at 3 years compared with durable polymer DES in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=332). Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Excel) vs. Durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher Select) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years (composite of cardiac death, recurrent infarction, and target vessel revascularization) (HR 0.772, 95% CI 0.458-1.337, p=0.728). A biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent resulted in similar rates of major adverse cardiac events at 3 years compared to a durable polymer stent in STEMI patients (10.4% vs 11.9%, HR 0.772).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: