Key result
While pulmonary rehabilitation did not significantly reduce aortic stiffness overall (11.3 vs. 11.1 m/s, p=0.34), 56% of patients experienced a clinically significant reduction that was associated with increased physical activity.
Why the study?
Changes in cardiovascular risk assessed via aortic stiffness during pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD are heterogeneous, suggesting potential subgroups of patients who do and do not benefit.
Does a 6-week pulmonary rehabilitation program reduce aortic stiffness in patients with COPD?
Cohort (n=102)
Yes
Does a 6-week pulmonary rehabilitation program reduce aortic stiffness in patients with COPD?
Absolute Event Rate: 11.1% vs 11.3%
p-value: p=0.34
While pulmonary rehabilitation does not reduce aortic stiffness overall in COPD patients, a subgroup experiences clinically meaningful reductions that correlate with increased physical activity.
Pulmonary rehabilitation yields no overall aortic stiffness reduction in COPD; leaves open activity-linked responder identification for targeted trials.
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have elevated cardiovascular risk, and cardiovascular disease is a major cause of death in COPD. The current literature indicates that changes in cardiovascular risk during pulmonary rehabilitation (assessed using aortic stiffness) are heterogeneous suggesting that there may be sub-groups of patients who do and do not benefit. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the characteristics of COPD patients who do and do not experience aortic stiffness reduction during pulmonary rehabilitation, examine how changes relate to physical activity and exercise capacity, and assess whether changes in aortic stiffness are maintained at 6 weeks following rehabilitation. METHODS: We prospectively measured arterial stiffness (aortic pulse-wave velocity), exercise capacity (Incremental Shuttle Walk Test) and physical activity (daily step count) in 92 COPD patients who started a six week pulmonary rehabilitation programme, 54 of whom completed rehabilitation, and 29 of whom were re-assessed six weeks later. RESULTS: Whilst on average there was no influence of pulmonary rehabilitation on aortic stiffness (pre- vs. post pulse-wave velocity 11.3 vs. 11.1 m/s p = 0.34), 56% patients responded with a significant reduction in aortic stiffness. Change in aortic stiffness (absolute and/or percentage) during rehabilitation was associated with both increased physical activity (rho = - 0.30, p = 0.042) and change in exercise capacity (rho = - 0.32, p = 0.02), but in multivariable analysis most closely with physical activity. 92% of the responders who attended maintained this response six weeks later. CONCLUSION: Elevated aortic stiffness in COPD is potentially modifiable in a subgroup of patients during pulmonary rehabilitation and is associated with increased physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03003208. Registered 26/12/ 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldabayan et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=102). Pulmonary rehabilitation vs. Baseline (pre-rehabilitation) was evaluated on Aortic pulse-wave velocity (aPWV) (p=0.34). While pulmonary rehabilitation did not significantly reduce aortic stiffness overall (11.3 vs. 11.1 m/s, p=0.34), 56% of patients experienced a clinically significant reduction that was associated with increased physical activity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: