Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Deep infection following total knee arthroplasty is a catastrophic complication. Recently, antibiotic-loaded bone cement has been applied to prevent deep infection after total joint arthroplasty. However, there is still controversy about the prophylactic effect of antibiotic-loaded bone cement after primary total knee arthroplasty. This study reviewed 2293 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with 1-year follow-up at the authors' hospital between February 2003 and October 2012 (mean±SD age, 64.8±10.7 years; male-to-female ratio, 1:5). All potential risk factors, including sex, age, height, weight, body mass index, diagnosis (osteoarthritis or other), diabetic status, operative time (categorized as either ≤120 minutes or >120 minutes), bilateral/unilateral procedure, surgeon volume (categorized as either ≥30 cases/year or <30 cases/year), and bone cement type, were collected. A total of 10 patients who had deep infection were identified during follow-up. Rates of deep infection for antibiotic-loaded bone cement and for plain cement were both 0.40%, and the difference was not significant with Fisher's exact test (P=1.000). Adjusted for the unevenly distributed risk factors (age, height, weight, diagnosis, bilateral/unilateral surgery, and operative time) in both groups, the results of logistic analysis showed that antibiotic-loaded bone cement did not reduce the rate of deep infection following primary total knee arthroplasty compared with plain cement (P=.865; odds ratio, 0.835; 95% confidence interval, 0.105-6.713). The study showed that antibiotic-loaded bone cement had no effect on the prevention of deep infection after primary total knee arthroplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: