Key result
The Persian version of the Cardiac Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating exercise self-efficacy in patients with cardiovascular disease, demonstrating a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87.
Why the study?
Assessing exercise self-efficacy in patients with CVD is necessary to tailor interventions, prompting the validation of the Iranian version of the Cardiac Exercise Self-efficacy Scale.
Is the Iranian version of the Cardiac Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating exercise self-efficacy in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=260)
No
Is the Iranian version of the Cardiac Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating exercise self-efficacy in patients with cardiovascular disease?
The Persian version of the Cardiac Exercise Self-efficacy Scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing exercise self-efficacy in Iranian patients with cardiovascular disease.
Supports Persian Cardiac Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale reliability in Iranian CVD patients; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
BACKGROUND: The assessment of exercise self-efficacy in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is necessary to conduct tailored interventions. The aim of the current study was to validate the Iranian version of the Cardiac Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (CESE) for patients with CVD. METHODS: To develop the Iranian version of the CESE scale, a forward and back translation procedure was followed. Data were collected from 260 patients with CVD who were admitted to Imam Ali Cardiovascular Hospital, Iran, using convenience sampling. Psychometric properties of the scale including validity (face and content validity, discriminant, concurrent, convergent, divergent, and construct validity) and reliability (internal consistency, and test-retest reliability) were assessed. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The questionnaire had a good face and content validity and reliability, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.42. The questionnaire discriminated well between subgroups according to their medical conditions and the "health transition" item in the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). There was a significant correlation between CESE and the physical components of the SF-36 (P < 0.001). In addition, a strong to moderate significant correlation was found between the CESE and the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (ESES) (r = 0.77; P < 0.01) and between CESE and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) total (r = -0.45; P < 0.001). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified a four-factor structure model, explaining 71.02% of the observed variance. CONCLUSION: The Persian version of the CESE is a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of CVD patients' exercise self-efficacy level in performing regular exercise behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajati et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=260). Cardiac Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (CESE) was evaluated on Scale reliability and validity (Cronbach's alpha 0.87). The Persian version of the Cardiac Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating exercise self-efficacy in patients with cardiovascular disease, demonstrating a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: