This paper provides a critical examination of some common “theoretically based” approaches to frequency analysis (a general discussion of which appears in Part 1 of the paper) and the myths they have generated about the upper tails of hydrological distributions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
V. Klemeš (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: