Clinical trials have demonstrated that prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are highly effective in preventing HPV infection, but the impact of vaccination on HPV prevalence rates in real-world, community settings is uncertain. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:This study provides evidence of a substantial decrease in the prevalence of vaccine-type HPV among young women and evidence of herd protection in a community only 4 years after the quadrivalent HPV vaccine was licensed.abstract OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare prevalence rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) in young women before and after HPV vaccine introduction to determine the following: (1) whether vaccine-type HPV infection decreased, (2) whether there was evidence of herd protection, and (3) whether there was evidence for typereplacement (increased prevalence of nonvaccine-type HPV).METHODS: Young women 13 to 26 years of age who had had sexual contact were recruited from 2 primary care clinics in 2006-2007 for a prevaccination surveillance study (N = 368, none were vaccinated) and 2009-2010 for a postvaccination surveillance study (N = 409, 59% were vaccinated).Participants completed a questionnaire and were tested for cervicovaginal HPV DNA.HPV prevalence rates were compared in the pre-versus postsurveillance studies by using x 2 tests.Propensity score weighting was used to balance differences in covariates between the 2 surveillance studies. RESULTS:The mean age was ∼19 years for both groups of participants and most were African American and non-Hispanic.After propensity score weighting, the prevalence rate for vaccine-type HPV decreased substantially (31.7%-13.4%,P , .0001).The decrease in vaccine-type HPV not only occurred among vaccinated (31.8%-9.9%,P , .0001) but also among unvaccinated (30.2%-15.4%,P , .0001)postsurveillance study participants.Nonvaccine-type HPV increased (60.7%-75.9%,P , .0001) for vaccinated postsurveillance study participants.CONCLUSIONS: Four years after licensing of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine, there was a substantial decrease in vaccine-type HPV prevalence and evidence of herd protection in this community.The increase in nonvaccine-type HPV in vaccinated participants should be interpreted with caution but warrants further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2012 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: