Key result
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation significantly increased online corticospinal excitability compared to sham stimulation (β 0.05) in healthy adults.
Why the study?
Little is known about how the locus coeruleus contributes to tuning corticospinal excitability, and no studies have examined the effect of tVNS on corticospinal excitability online during active stimulation.
Does transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation increase corticospinal excitability and pupil size in humans?
RCT (n=28)
Single-blind (sham matched for perception)
Randomly interleaved trials
No
Does transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation increase corticospinal excitability and pupil size in humans?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation acutely increases corticospinal excitability and pupil size during active stimulation, highlighting its neuromodulatory effects.
Background Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has emerged as a method for interrogating the role of the locus coeruleus (LC) norepinephrine system in human behavior. Tuning of excitability in the corticospinal tract is central to many cognitive and motor processes, but little is known about how the LC contributes to this tuning. In particular, no existing studies have examined the effect of tVNS on corticospinal excitability “online” during active stimulation, where the largest effects on pupil size are observed. Method To address this question, we delivered repeated 4-second trains of tVNS and sham stimulation and elicited MEPs during stimulation trains (online) and shortly after train offset (offline). Pupil size was concurrently recorded throughout each train. Results We discovered that tVNS significantly increases corticospinal excitability compared to sham stimulation, but only when measured online and not offline. The excitatory effects on corticospinal excitability were greater in the latter half of tVNS trains. Pupil size was also significantly increased by tVNS compared to sham; however, the effect on pupil size peaked earlier during the tVNS trains compared to corticospinal excitability. In line with these distinct temporal profiles, changes in corticospinal excitability and pupil size were not significantly correlated, likely reflecting differences in the anatomical circuits underpinning each effect. Conclusions This work demonstrates for the first time that tVNS increases corticospinal excitability at rest, but the effect only emerges when corticospinal excitability is measured online during active tVNS. Implications for basic and clinical neuroscientific research are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denyer et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=28). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) vs. Sham stimulation (left earlobe) was evaluated on Online corticospinal excitability (normalized MEP amplitude during stimulation) (β 0.05, 95% CI 0.03-0.08, p=<0.001). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation significantly increased online corticospinal excitability compared to sham stimulation (β 0.05) in healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: