Detailedheat-transferdistributionsarepresentedforanarray ofjetsimpinging onatargetplatewithastaggered array of e lm cooling holes. The e ow impinges on the target plate through a row of impingement holes and exits the channel from the sides and through the e lm holes. The top plate has 12 rows of impingement holes, and the target platehas11 rows ofe lm holes. Theimpingementholes and the e lm holes have thesame diameterandarestaggered such that the air from the impingement hole does not exit directly through the e lm hole. The setup is typical of an impingement/transpiration cooled gas turbine airfoil. Additional to the e ow exiting through the e lm holes, there is an exit for crosse ow after impingement. The exit opening of the impingement channel is changed to provide three different spent air exit directions. The detailed heat-transfer coefe cient distributions were measured using a transient liquid crystal technique. Results are presented for a range of jet Reynolds numbers between 0.4 ££ 10 3 and 2.0 ££ 10 4 with different exit e ow orientations. Heat-transfer results for the target plate with e lm holes are compared with those without e lm holes under the same e ow conditions. Film extraction reduces crosse ow effects on jet impingement heat transfer. However, overall averaged heat-transfer rates on the target surface appear less affected by presence of e lm hole for cases where the crosse ow is generated in only one direction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekkad et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: