Key result
Pericardial adipose-derived stromal cells demonstrated intrinsically higher myogenic differentiation potential and provided more potent structural and functional cardiac repair after transplantation compared to subcutaneous inguinal stromal cells.
Why the study?
Do pericardial adipose-derived stromal cells improve cardiac repair and function compared to subcutaneous adipose-derived stromal cells in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Do pericardial adipose-derived stromal cells improve cardiac repair and function compared to subcutaneous adipose-derived stromal cells in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Pericardial adipose-derived stromal cells possess intrinsic cardiomyogenic properties and provide superior structural and functional cardiac repair after myocardial infarction compared to subcutaneous ADSCs in a rat model.
INTRODUCTION: Adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain, but the diversity of differentiation potential from different locations may vary with the developmental origin of their mesenchymal compartment. We therefore aim to compare the myogenic differentiation and reparative activity of ADSCs derived from the pericardial tissue to ADSCs of subcutaneous origin. METHODS: Pericardial and inguinal adipose tissues from Wistar rats were surgically obtained, and the stromal fraction was isolated after enzymatic digestion. The phenotypic epitopes of the resultant two types of ADSCs were analyzed with flow cytometry, and the expression of transcriptional factors was analyzed with immunostaining. Furthermore, their potential toward adipogenic, osteogenic, and myogenic differentiation also was compared. Finally, the reparative activity and the resultant functional benefits were examined by allograft transplantation into an infarcted model in rats. RESULTS: ADSCs from two adipose sources showed identical morphology and growth curve at the initial stage, but inguinal ADSCs (ingADSCs) sustained significantly vigorous growth after 25 days of cultivation. Although both ADSCs shared similar immunophenotypes, the pericardial ADSCs (periADSC) intrinsically exhibited partial expression of transcription factors for cardiogenesis (such as GATA-4, Isl-1, Nkx 2.5, and MEF-2c) and more-efficient myogenic differentiation, but less competent for adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation. After in vivo transplantation, periADSCs exhibited significantly vigorous reparative activity evidenced by thickening of ventricular wall and pronounced vasculogenesis and myogenesis, although the majority of prelabeled cells disappeared 28 days after transplantation. The structural repair also translated into functional benefits of hearts after infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Although two sources of ADSCs are phenotypically identical, pericADSCs constituted intrinsic properties toward myogenesis and vasculogenesis, and thus provided more potent reparative effects after transplantation; therefore, they represent an attractive candidate cell donor for cardiac therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2014) studied Myocardial infarction (animal model) (n=45). Pericardial adipose-derived stromal cells (periADSCs) vs. Inguinal adipose-derived stromal cells (ingADSCs) was evaluated on Percentage of cTnT-positive cells after cardiac induction (p=<0.01). Pericardial adipose-derived stromal cells demonstrated intrinsically higher myogenic differentiation potential and provided more potent structural and functional cardiac repair after transplantation compared to subcutaneous inguinal stromal cells.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: