1,1‘,5,5‘-tetramethyl-6,6‘-dioxobis(verdazyl) (BVD) reacts with copper(I) halides in acetonitrile and copper(II) halides in methanol to give copper(I) coordination polymers of composition [Cu 2 X 2 (BVD)] x . When X = Cl and X = Br, these polymers crystallize in orthorhombic unit cells with dimensions a = 6.684(1) Å, b = 12.524(3) Å, and c = 8.717(2) Å (X = Cl) and a = 12.680(2) Å, b = 6.744(1) Å, and c = 8.822(2) Å (X = Br). With X = I, powder diffraction indicates a monoclinic unit cell with dimensions a = 12.669 Å, b = 8.461 Å, c = 7.679 Å, and β = 91.88°, although poor crystal quality prevented a full structure determination. Magnetic susceptibility measurements taken on the three polymers indicate that the spins couple in one-dimensional chains with alternating exchange parameters: J 1 = −190 cm - 1, J 2 = −116 cm - 1 (X = Cl); J 1 = −200 cm - 1, J 2 = −110 cm - 1 (X = Br); and J 1 = −271 cm - 1, J 2 = −200 cm - 1 (X = I). Variable temperature ESR measurements on the unstable monomeric complex resulting from reaction of BVD with (CH 3 O) 3 PCuI indicate an interradical exchange parameter J of −230 cm - 1 . ESR spectra of all three complexes show extremely broad, featureless lines as a result of very rapid spin−lattice relaxation. The reduction in exchange between the two halves of the bis(verdazyl) ligand upon coordination, and the unusual ESR properties, require a delocalized structure, with significant spin density on the copper atom. Variation of the auxiliary ligands on the copper atom allows tuning of the intramolecular exchange.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brook et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: