This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study explored the effects of soil restoration on cadmium (Cd) body burden and renal tubular damage in inhabitants of Cd-polluted areas by estimating the lifetime Cd (LCd) intake and expected LCd intake without soil restoration. In total, 1819 participants (991 men and 828 women) were included in the analysis. Furthermore, 845 participants (503 men and 342 women) who had lived in Cd-polluted areas before soil restoration were selected to estimate LCd intake with and without soil restoration. LCd intake was estimated based on residential history and rice Cd concentrations in each area. First morning urine samples were collected for urinary Cd (U-Cd, as the Cd body burden) and β2-microglobulin (as the renal tubular marker) measurements. The mean LCd intake was 3.0 g for men and 2.6 g for women in Cd-polluted areas with soil restoration. The mean expected LCd intake without soil restoration was 5.1 g for men and 4.6 g for women, indicating that soil restoration reduced LCd intake by approximately 2 g for both sexes. Soil restoration significantly reduces LCd intake, Cd body burden, and renal tubular effects. This information is crucial for developing strategies to reduce Cd exposure worldwide.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nogawa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: