Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We analyzed in a retrospective analysis whether adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin (MMC) alone or with Tegafur (TG) is associated with long-term survival benefit in resected gastric cancer. Other prognostic factors are compared. METHODS: From 1977 to 1998, 314 consecutive totally resected gastric adenocarcinoma patients have been included in a survival study. In 151 patients no adjuvant therapy was given. In 163 patients, four courses of adjuvant chemotherapy was given, 109 of them with MMC, 10-20 mg/m(2) i.v. every 6 weeks and the other 54 with MMC plus TG, 500 mg/m(2) p.o. day for 42 consecutive days. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Survival benefit was seen in patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy compared with the controls (52% vs. 30% alive at the end of the study, relative risk = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.62, P < 0.0001), women (52% vs. 35%, RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.98, P = 0.0342) and increment of staging IB, II, IIIA, or IIIB (80, 56, 24 vs. 13%, respectively, RR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.42-2.35, P < 0.0001). Better prognosis of node-negative patients was observed only in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After curative surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin C, both alone or combined with Tegafur, improved the long-term cure rate over no postoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients. This benefit was not influenced by other prognostic factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grau et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: