A number of fields on an organic (a potato field, a pasture and a field with red cabbage) and a conventional mixed farm (a potato field, a pasture and a field with cauliflower) were compared with respect to nitrate leaching in winter, using both soil mineral N measurements and a simulation approach. Soil organic matter N mineralization rates of the surface layers were determined during laboratory incubations. Mineral N contents of the 0–90 cm layer of each field were monitored during the period October-March. A coupled N mineralization—leaching model was used to simulate NO3-leaching over this period. Calculated NO3-leaching was in the same range on most fields, between 66 and 87 kg NO3-N ha−1, except for the conventional pasture, which had smaller losses (35 kg NO3-N ha−1), and the conventional cauliflower, which had very large losses (293 kg NO3-N ha−1). The contribution of N mineralization during autumn and winter to NO3 leaching was important, and could only be taken into account explicitly using simulation models. The most remarkable difference with respect to N leaching was observed between the conventional cauliflower and organic red cabbage field, both with very high N fertilization rates. This was attributed to the differences in type of fertilizer applied, with N fertilization on the conventional fields much more conducive to N losses. The average NH4 +-N concentrations during the field experiment were larger on the organic fields than on the conventional fields. This indication for a retardation or inhibition of nitrification in the organic fields is an important observation, which obviously could have important implications for NO3 − leaching, but needs to be further investigated and quantified before it could be incorporated into simulation models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neve et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: